PHASE ONE

​

​

In PHASE ONE, all accepted submissions will be judged by both professional juries.

Criteria for professional juries:
i. Originality, creativity, and novelty of the idea proposed.
ii. Technical difficulty.
iii. Model content.
iv. Critical thinking reflected in the prototype.
v. Practicality and impact of the innovative product (individual, community, health, economic growth, green environment).
vi. Commercialisation potential of the innovative product (an idea proposed can be improved, upgraded).
vii. Bonus marks will be given if there is any quality quote that strongly describes the poster/prototype.

​

PHASE TWO

​

In PHASE TWO, the physical pitching session and the booth exhibition will be judged
by professional juries and the popularity voting contest (30%).

 

a. Criteria for professional juries:
i. Originality and creativity of the idea proposed (new idea or adaptation idea).
ii. Level of consumer-friendly (affordability, user-friendly, price to produce).
iii. Clarity of presentation (The use of visual, oral communication and effective public speaking, detailed presentation).
iv. Q&A session.
v. Design of the innovative product (materials used, aesthetics).
vi. Prototype’s appearance and presentation.
vii. Design of exhibition booth (Creativity).

 

b. Criteria for popularity voting contest:
i. All competing teams are required to submit their poster, the virtual prototype image, and a short video (#Optional) to the organizing committee, which will be posted on InvencMax 3.0 social media platforms.
ii. The first voting session is done online through posting on InvencMax 3.0 social media platforms.
iii. The second voting session is done physically through the visit of UTMians and outsiders during the science exhibition.
iv. The voting platform and procedure will be announced after all the submissions are done.